1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

I have a -sort of- nasty habit of unconsciously adopting my roommates pets. I.e. I somehow convince the animals to like me more and thus spend more time and be more affectionate towards me instead of their real parents. Sometimes this uncanny ability backfires…

image

At least I get to keep my Pyrrha shirt.

cute animals cats rabbit problems

More you might like

the-stray-liger
allthecanadianpolitics

The NDP’s Jenny Kwan calls on Justin Trudeau to condemn the U.S.’s inhumane policy of separating migrant children from their parents and placing them in cages.

Justin Trudeau refuses and calls it ‘playing politics’.

This is the context:

Trump migrant separation policy: Children ‘in cages’ in Texas

allthecanadianpolitics

Reminder that only the NDP has been calling out Donald Trump’s Government for their flagrant human rights abuses.

Liberals basically shrugged at ‘children in cages’. It took them days of pressure from the NDP like this before they said anything at all.

This is why even if the NDP doesn’t win it’s so important to get as many MP’s elected as possible. We need politicians with spines, willing to call out injustice.

Jenny Kwan better be re-elected. We need voices like hers now more than ever.

maximum-alien

If you are Canadian please vote on October 21st

And if you are not Canadian please spread awareness so Canadian followers act

Source: twitter.com
australet789
ill-be-over-here-with-the-cat

https://mobile.twitter.com/andreuswolf/status/948145964019343360

This is why I do not take ANYONE who uses “SJW” unironically seriously…

@an-average-sized-person, @aridara, @luchagcaileag, @iron-sunrise, @rationalsjdiscussions

fandomshatewomen

This is such an interesting take on anti-sjws and sjws in general.

Tl,dr: SJW is an overly broad term and is purposefully so. This allows conservatives to continuously move the dial on what “reasonable” is and to label anyone they deem “overly emotional/invested” as someone not worth listening to. Many “ SJWs” are just marginalized folks trying to speak out and their inability or refusal to fit in to the status quo is what conservatives mock ehen calling people SJWs

Mod C

capriciousnerd

After retweeting the thread on Twitter, the author contacted me to let me know it was put up as a blog post on their WordPress. It’s also easier to digest, too.

Source: ill-be-over-here-with-the-cat
the-stray-liger
renniequeer

Maybe it’s time to start throwing the ashes of the dead on the white house lawn again.

renniequeer

It occurs to me that not everyone knows about this.

In 1992, ACT-UP led a protest against George H.W. Bush, furious at his inaction in the face of the AIDS crisis. Angry queer people literally threw the ashes of their dead loved ones onto the white house lawn to shame the government into action. Another Ash Action happened in 1996.

There’s video. It is incredibly intense and made me openly sob the first time I watched it.

Sources: [x] [x] [x]

thefuckingauditorium

Angry “q*eer” people really? Say homosexuals you fucking cowards. How about you dont use a slur when talking about our history and suffering

renniequeer

ACT-UP was an explicitly queer organization that used that language for themselves, you absolute fucking moron.

Source: renniequeer
anrexor
autisticexpression

The appalling travesty that was BBC’s Sherlock has infested the Sherlock Holmes fandom like a malignant tumour so I want you all to know how awesome the OG literary Holmes was:

  • The literary Sherlock Holmes was an autistic coded character before people knew what autism was.
  • The literary Sherlock Holmes was an explicitly aromantic character before people had a word for that.
  • Literary Holmes solved mysteries not merely for the intellectual stimulation but also out of a genuine desire to do good. He cared deeply about every client. HE WAS NOT A HIGH-FUNCTIONING SOCIOPATH! He could definitely be insensitive and blunt but he was not callous or unfeeling.
  • Literary Sherlock threatened to beat a guy who was being creepy with his own stepdaughter.
  • Literary Sherlock learned to grow past his misogyny after a woman outsmarted him.
  • In particular, he was always respectful to Mrs Hudson, never belittling or talking down to her (the otherwise enjoyable Guy Ritchie films screw this up too). In fact, they got along so well that they were actually a very popular ship back in the day.
  • Literary Holmes would NEVER call Watson an idiot. He was his only friend who he loved and respected, even if he did get frustrated with him sometimes. He didn’t need to belittle others to feel powerful.
  • Literary Holmes and Watson broke into a corrupt man’s house and witnessed him being murdered by a woman he was blackmailing. They knew exactly who she was but they let her get away because they were chaotic good like that.
  • Literary Holmes had HUMILITY: something a smug prig like Steven Moffat will never understand. He could be arrogant but he had a sense of humour and was willing to admit when he was wrong. And he was wrong sometimes because he was a flawed human being, not some gross male power fantasy.
  • Literary Holmes respected the working class and was often disdainful of the rich. In Victorian England!
  • Literary Holmes indirectly caused the death of a guy who abused (and implicitly molested) his daughters and he didn’t give a single fuck about it.
  • At the end of the series, Holmes retires to Sussex to keep bees. Beekeepers are awesome.
deadcatwithaflamethrower

I will reblog this always.

Source: autisticexpression
See this in the app Show more
Top Photos